TheOther1

Punch you lol. This is not what you wanted to hear I'm sure 😂

Holy moly 5 year old thread bump lol... Flameboard didn't upload the videos so nobody here can re-upload them.

very random question lol..

That scene is epic.

Or have paid any attention to what wearing in the first place. Plus unless a sag was super obvious from the front, they would have no idea anyway. But... If you wanted to sag for the delivery driver... Then sag, just like you would on any other occasion 🙄

And why do you want to show your underwear to the delivery driver?

Right there is a few things here. Firstly, if images aren't showing in the gallery than there is a different problem than images not showing up on the homepage I've changed a setting for the home screen view so it shows more pictures, previously it was only showing images in certain folders. Images need to be approved by Flameboard or myself before they are visible to everyone... usually happens within the day. If you click on an image you've uploaded, it should say pending moderation or something. If a file image is too large it will tell you, i think the regular limit for

Bread

Locking this thread as I can't see it going anywhere constructive. The original poster has had his profile image removed as 1) the picture is not him and secondly and most importantly as per site rules we will delete any pictures of members we believe to be under the age of 16. Personally though I do express concern with someone even in their 30s (and older) talking to a 13 year old on a site like this, as @DamnHotSagger said, a fetish website for most people.

We've got this thread already.

Hott, but the music is annoying haha.

You tipped half the price of the food, then your gf tips more and gives a random person illegal drugs. Umm.... OK.....

Pm me.

I'd agree about Box. Deffo targeting the gay market.

Maybe, if you were dating someone younger than 18 you could go to school with them and learn how to construct a sentence which isn't a paragraph long.. That post was ridiculous regardless.

Looks like it is, I've removed it from the original post as I agree.. plus the normal website link was right above it, so I'm not sure I understand why it was there to begin with. I'm fine with referel links, but tell people what they are and don't try and disguise them, which is what seems to have happened here.

A very expensive and high end department store in London https://www.harrods.com/en-gb/off-white/stretch-cotton-trunks-pack-of-3-p000000000006212416 Holy...... These are expensive.

Not so much a new rule, but we will start to decline new pictures into the gallery where the image quality/size/resolution is not upto a standard. Sometimes there are images uploaded with terrible resolutions like 200x200 or even lower, these look bad on the site and I start to consider the authenticity of the images when the user claims they are of them. It's 2019 and whilst the standard isn't going to be so high everyone needs to buy a professional camera, the picture can't be so small that it looks stupid in the gallery. 99% of pictures uploaded are fine, so this decision makes n

I agree. But your "cheeky" look couldn't be more obvious rofl.

Couldn't be more of a turn off for some lol ... (me)

Well I can travel around where I live, or London, or Barcelona or wherever I am.. and I don't see any. When I can spend a week in a different major city and see no saggers, I would call it pretty dead lol

Well that's not what he said, he said it's dying... Ie.. Going down in popularity. I fully agree.

So your pulling a kids trousers down and forcing him to sag... 🙄

What lol..... You've got to be joking lol

Rules are 18 and over to be in the gallery section.