SaggerMatt

Those are cool!

He's a good guy, for sure!

Haha, they look great.

Agreed. I am not in-depth enough with asexuality to know if they define themselves as no-sex or not (lacking the urge to sex is fine as the reason). But, I think superficially people think of asexual as no-sex. I think anything more is too nuanced as I have said so far, and may even raise suspicion in a social situation.

That's interesting, jace, that you like a clothed sagger more than a naked man for sexual interest. I think it's cool, because sagging is meant to be really handsome. Yeah, I guess that's what they're saying with sagging being called a fetish. According to them, if you can have sex with it, but it's not an actual person, you're asexual. I say no and too nuanced. If you can have sex with a man, sagging and such, you would not have to call yourself asexual.

Very cool. I learn a lot as I grow older and find different interests as well that keep me going. Good advice. I was really like this in my early- to mid-20's.

No doubt he's attractive.

Yeah, what you said sounds more typically like what I think of when I think asexual. Though, must keep in mind with objects/situations that there is not a no-responsibility situation, and these things have their place in the universe. Which is why I and the original poster are a little questioning whether it can be really considered as no sex with these objects/situations/things. Peace!

Still not the most ideal.

"I'm not sexually attracted to people but I have a way to activate my libido" I think this is the part that was nuanced enough, that I would say I would not participate. If you can activate your sexual desires and are not sexually attracted, you automatically draw suspicion and such, because things are not in place/are array. I thought asexuality would mean that you could not have sex/masturbate/whatever. It would not be possible. Again, nuanced enough that I would abstain anyway. Like I said before, I think you would be in the clear regardless of attraction (physical, not

That'd be helpful. I'm sincerely concerned for the kid. Peace!

Oh, really? Should be preserved then somehow. Peace, and hope he does well with his sagging.

I watch Polish c-walk, where they sag, and that's about it. Peace to you guys, though!

So, you can be sexually aroused by fetishes enough to perform sex acts, but you have no sexual attraction. I think there must be sexual attraction to have arousal. I would check the chemistry on that. But, I see not being sexually attracted to a fetish. Sounds like a nuance that I wouldn't partake in if a were a practicing asexual. Peace, and interesting subject.

Yeah, I don't get why either. He is a cool sagger. I get that it's kind of sad we have such a long thread of saggers being stupid, because they aren't inherently by nature. Could be a better representation overall. Peace, though!

Definitely a help, I've found!

These are very interesting topics. If you are attracted, but get no sexual pleasure nor arousal, I think it could be called asexual at your pleasure/liking. I'd say it's up to you. It's not really going to affect the sexual community, so why I say you get this choice when thinking of interacting with others. I guess that could include a fetish upon which you act. Hope that helps, I don't think this is a clear subject, but keep up! It's important to enjoy what you like.

For sure. That it does! Peace!

Agreed. Those two guys are looking very dope there with their pissed pants.

Those are nice!

Haha, I'd admit that I'm rather small. I do aspire for bigness, to be honest as well. Dunno, both sizes are very appealing, though, actually.

That's very cool, Admiralolsen.

F**** yeah!

I think the internet helps a lot. I'm in a situation where I don't get out much, that's even before COVID and such, and coming to this board has always been a great relief and release to me. Peace, and love it!

No prob. I mean it!