StarsOnBlack

Oh, me neither, no worries. Now we know. 😅 Guess I was a little thrown off by the long list of twitter posts on the previous page clearly showing somebody's OnlyFans account.

This would've been a great time for whichever mod to clearly explain that we're not permitted to post links to OnlyFans, rather than delete my response without a word and make it look like I'm ignoring drake55's question.

I subscribe to their Onlyfans. Good stuff. Their usual content is 10-20min videos of one of them walking around in public sagging and the other following close behind with a camera. Plenty of stretching, bending over, adjusting, etc... Obviously it's not candid, per se, but if you like candids this pretty much scratches the same itch. There's also some videos of them jerking off together, but the public vids are the main appeal.

Heh, thanks for this compilation. I like the direction fashion is going these days, but always nice to return to the roots every once in a while. I had my sexual awakening to that kind of look back in the late 2000's when every high school classroom would be a sea of guys with boxers bunching out.

Serious advice? Come to Saggerworld for advice about your outfit, not for advice about sex. 🤦‍♂️ Like seriously, you do not need to have sex with men to know whether you're attracted to men, or likewise with women. If you're inclined to have sex with someone... that's essentially the definition of being attracted to them. You also have zero need to settle on an identity before you go looking for partners. Be safe; use a condom, be sober, don't agree to anything you're uncomfortable with. Treat it as a learning experience. Don't go in thinking you're going to play it off lik

I mean, it's weird as in "statistically unusual", sure, most guys enjoy being on at least one end of penetrative sex or both. But there's certainly nothing at all wrong with not liking penetrative sex, or any other form of sex, or even all forms of sex. To some extent it's going to be a practical problem finding guys who're okay with that, but I don't think anybody's really exempt from that particular problem. Tops are generally limited to dating bottoms and vice versa. Vers guys who aren't happy being 100% one or the other are generally limited to dating other vers guys. Asexual gay

Hell, I'll cover you entirely in chains and chuck you into the Pacific if it'll make you happy. 🤣

Do you mean to say that all this time we've been putting up with your yammering, all we had to do to shut you up was gag you and you would've cooperated with it? /jk 🤣

You could say the same about a sagger's pants blocking part of the view, no? I think the tease is part of what makes it special. 😁

+1 for tight clothes, and strangely enough, it's hotter for me if the guy's also unnecessarily wearing shorts over tights. 😅 It doesn't make much practical sense, but it looks really good. Kind of like the inverse of sagging that way, somehow it's sexier than just wearing the base layer with nothing over it.

That's also why I brought up Asia and Africa. Together they contain about 75% of the world's population, nearly everyone there has brown eyes (minus northern/western Asia), and I wouldn't really expect sagging to be popular in either one, hence saggers having a higher rate of blue/green eyes compared to the world average. But if it looked like I was implying something negative about any particular race, then thank you for saying something instead of just letting it lie. 👍

I'm not implying anything unsavory. I'm just saying I can't remember ever having seen even one black sagger here (even though I'm sure there must be some, and I'm sure they're as amazing as anybody else). If we're trying to figure out why so many people who answered this survey have blue eyes, the conspicuous rarity of black people here is probably a contributor. If you were to do a demographic survey and find out that ~95% of active posters are white, then you have your answer, that's why so few people here have brown eyes even though ~79% of people worldwide have brown eyes. Basically we

Great videos too. He's probably destroyed more pairs of underwear than half the high school bullies in the US combined. 🤣

...this just jogged something else loose for me. Anyone else notice that hardly anybody here is black? That seems pretty strange, what with sagging having its roots in hip hop culture. If for some reason black people are statistically underrepresented here on Saggerworld, that would certainly crank up the number of saggers here with blue eyes in particular. Offhand I'd say nearly everyone I've seen who has pics uploaded is white.

I had a similar thought the first time I read that around 45% of the world's adults abstain from alcohol. That sounded really high to me until I remembered that the US + EU comprises less than half the world. 😅 23.7% of the world is Muslim and prohibited from drinking alcohol, so that on its own makes the 45% total sound pretty plausible. Apparently 70-79% of the world has brown eyes, which makes sense when you consider how much of the world's population comes from regions where nearly everyone has brown eyes. Most of Asia and Africa, for starters. In the US it's more like just 4

There's a lot of overlap between sagging and wedgies. Lots of content creators here, on Instagram, and elsewhere are into both of them. A lot comes up if you search "wedgie" on Saggerworld. Xag just posted new sagging pics earlier today, and he's been wedgie fetish royalty since the OG days. https://www.saggerworld.com/gallery/image/130642-1136876c-c1b8-43a5-b03f-567fed936d2f_1_201_a_resultjpg/ The overlap makes rational sense, they're both specific types of underwear fetish, same reason lots of people here are into other underwear and clothing-related fetishes. One obvious point in commo

Story tax! Any good ones?

That'll be just fine, seeing as I'm already in the business of ripping things up. XD

You can't submit your reimbursement, I haven't ripped anything off of you to reimburse you for. XD ...so it seems we've each got a problem, and there just so happens to be one obvious solution that covers both of them. 😈 XD

I mean I'd reimburse the victim for any pair I destroyed, that seems only fair. What's in short supply is sufficiently cute guys who'd consent to letting me yank their undies until they're totally shredded. 😆

Dang, you let him do it to you? Man I want friends like you. 🤣

Seconded. One polite request for that video, plz. 😅

C. Getting them does nothing for me, I just get off on giving them. And because it's very much a kink activity for me, and because I'm not in high school anymore, for me it's more something to do in private than in public. Besides, if I wedgie my bf I'm probably then going to get hard and want to take things further, so all the better if we're already at home. Which do you prefer on other guys, deliberate sagging or just natural sagging because he's too skinny to keep his pants up?

They've all got their appeal, I think. Boxers are pretty impossible to keep hidden, and less-stretchy fabric plus sometimes a center seam means they can dish out a lot of punishment. Boxers wedgies are my favorite to watch, I like the tone of a couple of bros just messing around and wrestling until somebody sees boxers conveniently available and goes for it. ❤️ Boxerbriefs stretch forever, there's something aesthetically pleasant about fabric stretching from the victim's belt right up to the neck, no rips, no leg holes showing, Briefs just speak for themselves. Wear them in a

I mean, ever notice that every component of briefs is practically just designed perfectly for wedgies? There's the strip on the underside that gets pulled up the ass, leg holes around the hips that lock in and keep it from ripping too soon (and double as a second place to grip if you pull far enough), a front so the underside has something to pull tight against, and a waistband to be grabbed. Nothing around the legs to anchor them in place and keep them from rocketing upward, no loose extra fabric that messes with the geometry of the wedgie. Wearing any type of underwear means some risk of